top of page

Understanding the Differences Between Ferric Sulfate and Ferric Chloride Solutions in Water Treatment

Aug 2

2 min read

0

27

0




When it comes to water treatment, selecting the right chemical coagulant is crucial for ensuring effective and efficient processes. Among the commonly used coagulants, ferric sulfate and ferric chloride stand out due to their proven efficacy in various applications. In this blog post, we'll explore the key differences between ferric sulfate and ferric chloride solutions, including their molecular composition, efficiency, and general effectiveness.


Molecular Composition and Properties

Both ferric sulfate and ferric chloride are iron-based coagulants, but they differ significantly in their molecular structures and properties.


Ferric Sulfate (Fe₂(SO₄)₃)

  • Molecular Formula: Fe₂(SO₄)₃

  • Molecular Weight: 399.88 g/mol

  • Appearance: Dark red-brown liquid

  • Specific Gravity (20°C): 1.51 - 1.58

  • Iron Content: Approximately 12.35% Fe³⁺

  • Common Applications: Coagulation and flocculation processes for turbidity and color removal, phosphate precipitation, and sludge conditioning.

Ferric Chloride (FeCl₃)

  • Molecular Formula: FeCl₃

  • Molecular Weight: 162.2 g/mol

  • Appearance: Dark brown liquid

  • Specific Gravity (20°C): 1.39 - 1.46

  • Iron Content: Approximately 13.5% Fe³⁺

  • Common Applications: Superior for coagulation, hydrogen sulfide control, phosphate removal, struvite control, and heavy metal removal.

Efficiency and Effectiveness

Ferric sulfate and ferric chloride differ in their efficiency and effectiveness, impacting their usage and performance in water treatment applications.


Efficiency: Ferric chloride is often found to be more efficient than ferric sulfate. This increased efficiency means that lower dosages of ferric chloride can achieve the same or better results compared to ferric sulfate. In many cases, ferric chloride has been shown to be 2 to 2.5 times more efficient, which translates to reduced chemical usage and lower operational costs.


Effectiveness: Both chemicals are effective coagulants, but ferric chloride has some advantages in specific applications. For instance, it is highly effective in controlling hydrogen sulfide, which can cause odor and corrosion issues. Additionally, ferric chloride's higher iron content makes it more effective in phosphate removal and struvite control, crucial for preventing scaling and maintaining efficient operations.

Comparison Table

Property

Ferric Sulfate

Ferric Chloride

Molecular Formula

Fe₂(SO₄)₃

FeCl₃

Molecular Weight

399.88 g/mol

162.2 g/mol

Appearance

Dark red-brown liquid

Dark brown liquid

Specific Gravity (20°C)

1.51 - 1.58

1.39 - 1.46

Iron Content (Fe³⁺)

12.35%

13.5%

Coagulation Efficiency

Moderate

High

H₂S Control

Moderate

High

Phosphate Removal

Effective

Highly Effective

Struvite Control

Moderate

Highly Effective

Common Uses

Turbidity removal, sludge conditioning,

Hydrogen sulfide control, phosphate removal,


phosphate precipitation

struvite control, heavy metal removal

Conclusion

Choosing between ferric sulfate and ferric chloride depends on the specific needs and challenges of the water treatment process. Ferric chloride's higher efficiency and effectiveness, particularly in challenging conditions like hydrogen sulfide control and phosphate removal, make it a preferred choice in many scenarios. However, ferric sulfate remains a reliable option for basic coagulation and flocculation processes.

At Volusol Bulk & Contract Manufacturing, we offer both ferric sulfate and ferric chloride solutions to meet the diverse needs of the water treatment industry. Our team is dedicated to providing high-quality products and exceptional service, ensuring optimal performance in your operations. For more information, visit our website at bulk.volusol.com or contact us directly. We are here to help you find the best solution for your water treatment challenges.

Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.
bottom of page